AlgoVesta vs HaasOnline: Signal-First Execution vs Scriptable Bot Platform (2026)

What each one costs

Checked 12 August 2026 — verify current rates on haasonline.com before deciding.

HaasOnline runs four tiers, priced by how many bots and how much backtesting you get, not by exchange count (all four tiers list 24 exchanges). Starter is $11.99/mo (3 bots, 15 open orders per bot, 1 month of backtesting). Standard is $29.99/mo, HaasOnline's "Most popular" tier (8 bots, 25 open orders per bot, 6 months of backtesting, and where AI agent/MCP access starts). Professional is $59.99/mo (20 bots, 50 open orders per bot, 12 months of backtesting). TradeServer is $149.99/mo (100+ bots, 150 open orders per bot, up to 36 months of backtesting, self-hosted or managed). Annual billing is shown as $143.93 / $359.93 / $719.93 / $1,799.93 respectively, advertised as "Save 40% in crypto" — that discount is tied to paying the annual invoice in cryptocurrency, per HaasOnline's own pricing page.

AlgoVesta charges a flat monthly subscription instead: Starter at $39/mo ($32.50/mo billed annually), Pro at $89/mo ($74 annually), Elite at $179/mo ($149 annually, adds MetaTrader 5 forex). There is no per-trade cut and no performance fee.

The two pricing models answer different questions. HaasOnline's tiers scale with how many bots and how much backtest history you need, so a single active strategy can start cheaper than any AlgoVesta plan. AlgoVesta's tiers scale with which markets and signal sources you connect (crypto only, versus crypto plus MetaTrader 5 forex on Elite), not with bot count or order caps.

Can an AI assistant place the trade for you?

On AlgoVesta, yes, through its MCP server, which reaches 16 crypto exchanges and MetaTrader 5 from one connection — new connections start in paper mode with a $5,000 virtual balance, and live trading needs a separate 2FA-created key plus a server-side stop-loss and the leverage cap from your own risk policy, which the assistant can't override. HaasOnline also ships an MCP server, from the Standard plan up, but it is built the opposite way: per HaasOnline's own documentation, every one of its roughly 47 MCP tools is read-only or backtest-only — script management, running backtests and Lab optimizations, and retrieving bot, market, and wallet data. None of them place a live order, start or stop a bot, or move funds; HaasOnline's own site puts it plainly: the assistant "can never place a trade or move funds." So an assistant connected to HaasOnline can draft and test a HaasScript strategy for you to launch yourself, while an assistant connected to AlgoVesta can — inside the guardrails above — actually place the trade.

Where HaasOnline is the better choice

If what you want is to write and own your own trading logic, HaasOnline is built for that in a way AlgoVesta isn't. HaasScript is a full scripting language (HaasOnline advertises 500+ commands in HaasScript 2.0) with a drag-and-drop visual editor as an alternative to hand-coding, so you can encode a proprietary scalping, arbitrage, grid, or DCA strategy exactly the way you want it, not just parse an incoming signal. Its backtesting goes deeper too: up to 36 months of history and, per its own marketing, "thousands of concurrent backtests" for parameter optimization on the TradeServer tier — well beyond a quick strategy check. TradeServer also lets you self-host the whole platform, keeping your exchange API keys on your own machine instead of any vendor's cloud, which matters if self-custody of credentials is a hard requirement for you.

To be equally clear about the other side: AlgoVesta has no scripting language and no local/self-hosted deployment option — it's signal-driven (Telegram, TradingView, and forex signal rooms) and hosted-only. It also doesn't offer HaasOnline's multi-year backtest depth or bulk parameter-sweep backtesting. If your workflow centers on writing and stress-testing your own strategy code rather than automating signals you already receive, HaasOnline's tools go further than AlgoVesta's.